From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jimenez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
Dec 31, 2020
No. 4:17-cr-142-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 31, 2020)

Opinion

No. 4:17-cr-142-DPM

12-31-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. MARIA DE JESUS JIMENEZ DEFENDANT


ORDER

Jimenez moves to serve the remainder of her sentence in home confinement or a halfway house on prerelease custody. She says this is appropriate because the Bureau of Prisons has failed to implement the Family Unity Demonstration Project, which would allow "eligible prisoners to live in community correctional facilities with their children." 34 U.S.C. § 12261(a). But this Court has no authority to grant the relief Jimenez seeks. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582(c), 3621(b) & 3624(c); United States v. Wright, 2008 WL 4219076, at *1 (D. Utah 15 Sept. 2008). Further, Congress never appropriated funds for the Project. Soto v. Upton, 2018 WL 3196956, at *1 (N.D. Tex. 29 June 2018). Jimenez's claim that the Bureau is violating the law by not implementing the Project therefore fails. 34 U.S.C. § 12261(a). Motion, Doc. 69, denied.

So Ordered.

/s/_________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

31 December 2020


Summaries of

United States v. Jimenez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
Dec 31, 2020
No. 4:17-cr-142-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 31, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. MARIA DE JESUS JIMENEZ DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

Date published: Dec 31, 2020

Citations

No. 4:17-cr-142-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 31, 2020)