Opinion
Case No. 2:16-cr-0142-APG-CWH
12-29-2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE CARLOS JIMENEZ, Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS
(ECF Nos. 18, 36, 41)
Defendant Jose Carlos Jimenez filed a motion to suppress evidence seized in connection with his arrest. ECF No. 18. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered his Report & Recommendation recommending that the motion to suppress be denied. ECF No. 36. Mr. Jimenez filed an Objection to the Report & Recommendation (ECF No. 41) and the Government filed a Response (ECF No. 42). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(b), I have conducted a de novo review of the motion to suppress and related papers. Judge Hoffman's Report & Recommendation sets forth the proper legal analysis and factual bases for the decisions. I accept and adopt the analysis and conclusions. Good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Hoffman's Report & Recommendation (ECF No. 36) is accepted. Mr. Jimenez's motion to suppress (ECF No. 18) is denied and his objection (ECF No. 41) is overruled.
Dated: December 29, 2016.
/s/_________
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE