From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jetter

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 23, 1970
421 F.2d 839 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 24508.

January 23, 1970.

Howard J. Bechefsky, of Sheela, Lightner, Hughes, Hilmen Castro, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Phillip W. Johnson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.

The Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.


This is an appeal from a conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 176(a) in a nonjury case. The parties stipulated that appellant entered this country from Mexico in an automobile in which he was the sole occupant and driver and which contained 220 pounds of marijuana. It was also stipulated that appellant declared no merchandise at the border and admitted at the border that he had bought the marijuana in Mexico. (Gov. Ex. 1) The matter was submitted to this court without argument solely upon the theory that 21 U.S.C. § 176(a) violates the defendant's privilege against self-incrimination. Upon consideration of the briefs on file, we affirm the conviction on the authority of Witt v. United States, 9th Cir., decided 6/6/69, 413 F.2d 303.


Summaries of

United States v. Jetter

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 23, 1970
421 F.2d 839 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

United States v. Jetter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Arthur JETTER, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 23, 1970

Citations

421 F.2d 839 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

United States v. Vaught

The same contention was rejected by this court in United States v. Perez, 426 F.2d 799 (1970), involving the…

United States v. Perez

We think this self-incrimination contention is foreclosed by the decision of this court in Witt v. United…