Opinion
Nos. 5917, 5923, 5942.
November 12, 1929. Rehearing Denied December 17, 1929.
Cases Nos. 5917 and 5923:
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; John H. McNary, Judge.
Case No. 5942:
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Northern District of California; Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge.
In Cases Nos. 5917 and 5923:
George Neuner, U.S. Atty., and Francis E. Marsh, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Portland, Or., and William Wolff Smith, Gen. Counsel, J. O'C. Roberts, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and James T. Brady and C.L. Dawson, Attys., U.S. Veterans' Bureau, all of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
B.A. Green, of Portland, Or., and Alvin Gerlack, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
In Case No. 5942:
Geo. J. Hatfield, U.S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal., and William Wolff Smith, Gen. Counsel, J. O'C. Roberts, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and James T. Brady and C.L. Dawson, Attys., U.S. Veterans' Bureau, all of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Richard O'Connor and James B. O'Connor, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.
The sole question presented by the appeals in these three actions, brought upon converted war risk insurance policies, is whether or not these policies became incontestable where a total loss occurred within six months after the issuance of the new policy. This question is answered in the negative in the opinion this day rendered in James W. Jordan v. United States of America, 36 F.2d 43.
Judgments reversed.