From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jefferson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Mar 23, 2020
Criminal No. CCB-19-487 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2020)

Summary

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Delacruz

Opinion

Criminal No. CCB-19-487

03-23-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEON JEFFERSON


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Federal defendant Teon Jefferson has filed a motion seeking reconsideration of the detention order issued by Magistrate Judge Thomas DiGirolamo on January 29, 2020. The motion, which will be treated as an appeal, has been fully briefed and no further hearing is necessary. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be Denied.

Preliminarily, the court adopts the reasoning of Judge Paul W. Grimm set forth in his recent ruling in United States v. Martin, No. CR PWG-19-140-13, 2020 WL 1274857 (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2020). See also U.S. v. Bilbrough, TDC-20-033-3, ECF 76 (Order by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Sullivan). The first step is to undertake an individualized assessment of the factors identified by the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3142(g), based on the record in front of Judge DiGirolamo. The court will then turn to the changed circumstances proffered by Jefferson.

Jefferson is charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. At his detention hearing, the judge found by clear and convincing evidence based on the government's proffer that Jefferson posed a risk to the safety of other persons and the community, and that there were no conditions or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure community safety. He explained:

On 6/29/19 police responded to a report of shots fired. Police observed [defendant] in the area. [Defendant] ran when saw police. As he ran, [defendant] threw an object. Object turned out be a gun. [Defendant] admitted possession of the gun. Offense occurred less than 2 months after [defendant] placed on probation for a felony CDS offense. No suitable 3rd party custodian"

ECF 17. None of these circumstances have changed. Defense counsel proffers that, because Jefferson is asthmatic, his continued detention at the DC Jail/Correctional Treatment Facility ("CTF") poses an unacceptable health risk that should result in release to home confinement with location monitoring. No new third-party custodian has been identified, however, and location monitoring by PreTrial Services is a particularly scarce resource under the current conditions. As the government explains in detail, precautionary measures have been implemented at CTF in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jefferson proposes to live with his mother, a home health care worker, and two younger siblings. It is not at all clear that this situation would not pose a health risk to both Jefferson and the community. --------

The court recognizes the sincere concern undoubtedly felt by Jefferson, his family, and his counsel in these very difficult circumstances. Upon a de novo review of the record, however, I find that Judge DiGirolamo's ruling was correct, and that, even taking into account Jefferson's medical condition and the COVID-19 outbreak, there remain no conditions or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure the safety of the community if Jefferson were released. Finally, the current conditions of Jefferson's confinement at CTF do not rise to the level of a constitutional violation such as to override the Bail Reform Act.

Accordingly, the motion (ECF 22) is Denied.

So Ordered this 23rd day of March, 2020.

/S/_________

Catherine C. Blake

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Jefferson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Mar 23, 2020
Criminal No. CCB-19-487 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2020)

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Delacruz

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Sanchez De Hernandez

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Bhimani

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Pazmino

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Christy

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Maltsev

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Langley

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Strange

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Romeu

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Lara-Casado

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Rodriguez

denying motion of asthmatic pretrial detainee

Summary of this case from United States v. Cagle

denying release to defendant with asthma who was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon

Summary of this case from United States v. Chase

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Washington

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Laury

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Sisk

denying asthmatic defendant's motion for release due to COVID-19 outbreak

Summary of this case from Cuevas v. Pennsylvania

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Andrewsh

denying motion of asthmatic defendant

Summary of this case from United States v. Capozzi

noting that the COVID-19 public health crisis is a factor to consider

Summary of this case from United States v. Wedington
Case details for

United States v. Jefferson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEON JEFFERSON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Date published: Mar 23, 2020

Citations

Criminal No. CCB-19-487 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Williams

Yet, this Court has stated that the mere presence of the virus, even in the detention setting, does not…

United States v. West

Nevertheless, like other judges in this district, I recognize the serious threat to health posed by the…