From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jarrett

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 25, 1971
439 F.2d 1135 (3d Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 19223.

Argued March 2, 1971.

Decided March 25, 1971.

Frank J. McDonnell, Scranton, Pa., for appellant.

James W. Walker, Asst. U.S. Atty., S. John Cottone, U.S. Atty., Scranton, Pa., for appellee.

Before HASTIE, Chief Judge, and ADAMS and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


After a trial before the district court sitting without a jury, the appellant was found guilty of willfully refusing to submit to induction under the Universal Military Training and Service Act. On June 30, 1970 the district court denied a motion for a new trial. This appeal followed. However, no sentence has yet been imposed pursuant to the conviction.

Neither the order finding the accused guilty nor the order denying a new trial is an appealable final order absent any imposition of sentence. United States v. Knight, 3d Cir. 1947, 162 F.2d 809. "To create finality it was necessary that petitioner's conviction should be followed by sentence. * * *" Berman v. United States, 1937, 302 U.S. 211, 212, 58 S.Ct. 164, 166, 82 L.Ed. 204.

This appeal will be dismissed for want of an appealable order.


Summaries of

United States v. Jarrett

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 25, 1971
439 F.2d 1135 (3d Cir. 1971)
Case details for

United States v. Jarrett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America v. Eric Martin JARRETT, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 25, 1971

Citations

439 F.2d 1135 (3d Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Hashagen

The Mathews panel rejected this argument on grounds that an order denying such a motion is not a final…

United States v. Mathews

Moreover, this court has clearly held that "[n]either the order finding the accused guilty nor the order…