From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:12-cr-0213 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:12-cr-0213 AWI DLB

07-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELISEO JARA, JR., SERGIO JARA, ANTONIO PEREZ-MARCIAL, LUCIA YOLANDA CHAVEZ, ARLENE JEANETTE MOJARDIN, CANDACE SHANTEL GONZALES, JOSEPH SHAWN CHAVEZ, JR., MELISSA ROCHELLE JARA, and RICARDO FABIAN SALINAS, Defendants.

DAVID A. TORRES Attorney for defendant CANDACE SHANTEL GONZALES BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KIRK E. SHERRIFF HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III Assistant U.S. Attorneys


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KIRK E. SHERRIFF

HENRY Z. CARBAJAL

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

Attorneys for the

United States of America

STIPULATION AND

PROTECTIVE ORDER BETWEEN THE

UNITED STATES AND DEFENDANT

CANDACE SHANTEL GONZALES

WHEREAS, the discovery in this case is voluminous and contains a large amount of personal information including but not limited to Social Security numbers, dates of birth, driver's license numbers, bank account numbers, telephone numbers, and residential addresses ("Protected Information"); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to avoid both the necessity of large scale redactions and the unauthorized disclosure or dissemination of Protected Information to anyone not a party to the court proceedings in this matter;

The parties agree that entry of a stipulated protective order is appropriate.

THEREFORE, defendant CANDACE SHANTEL GONZALES, by and through her counsel of record David A. Torres ("Defense Counsel"), and plaintiff the United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. This Court may enter protective orders pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and its general supervisory authority.

2. This Order pertains to all discovery provided to or made available to Defense Counsel as part of the discovery in this case (hereafter, collectively known as the "discovery").

3. By signing this Stipulation and Protective Order, Defense Counsel agrees not to share any documents that contain Protected Information with anyone other than Defense Counsel and designated defense investigators and support staff. Defense Counsel may permit the defendant to view unredacted documents in the presence of her attorney, defense investigators and support staff. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff shall not allow the defendant to copy Protected Information contained in the discovery. The parties agree that Defense Counsel, defense investigators, and support staff may provide the defendant with copies of documents from which Protected Information has been redacted.

4. The discovery and information therein may be used only in connection with the litigation of this case and for no other purpose. The discovery is now and will forever remain the property of the United States Government. Defense Counsel will return the discovery to the Government or certify that it has been destroyed at the conclusion of the case.

5. Defense Counsel will store the discovery in a secure place and will use reasonable care to ensure that it is not disclosed to third persons in violation of this agreement.

6. Defense Counsel shall be responsible for advising the defendant, employees, other members of the defense team, and defense witnesses of the contents of this Stipulation and Order.

7. In the event that the defendant substitutes counsel, undersigned Defense Counsel agrees to withhold discovery from new counsel unless and until substituted counsel agrees also to be bound by this Order or the Court modifies this Order regarding such transfer of discovery.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

By: _________________

DAVID A. TORRES

Attorney for defendant

CANDACE SHANTEL GONZALES

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: _________________

KIRK E. SHERRIFF

HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Jara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:12-cr-0213 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Jara

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELISEO JARA, JR., SERGIO JARA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 27, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:12-cr-0213 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)