From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. James

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2013
511 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7896

02-26-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VICTOR V. JAMES, a/k/a Vic, Defendant - Appellant.

Victor V. James, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-15) Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor V. James, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Victor V. James appeals the district court's order granting the Government's Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because James raises no issue pertaining to the district court's disposition in his informal brief, he has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Although the district court granted the Rule 35(b) motion, James presumably seeks to appeal the extent of the sentence reduction.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. James

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2013
511 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. James

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VICTOR V. JAMES, a/k/a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 26, 2013

Citations

511 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2013)