From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. James

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 26, 2011
No. 11-208 GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-208 GEB

08-26-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT JAMES, Defendant.

DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Scott James BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney M. Petrik for PAUL HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Bar #177913

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Defendant

SCOTT JAMES

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER]

TO SET HEARING ON OCTOBER 21,

2011, AT 9:00 A.M.; PROPOSED

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell

THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through counsel, Paul Hemesath, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael Petrik, Jr., attorney for Mr. James, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for September 30, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., and set a hearing on defendant's motions on October 21, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.

Counsel for Mr. James requires this time to review discovery, confer with Mr. James, and to prepare motions on behalf of Mr. James.

The parties stipulate that Mr. James will file motions on or before September 16, 2011; that the government will file an opposition on or before October 7, 2011; and that Mr. James may file an optional reply on or before October 14, 2011.

The parties also stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through October 21, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. James' request outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. James in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Scott James

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

M. Petrik for

PAUL HEMESATH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the hearing on October 21, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) (Local Code T4). For the reasons set forth above, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. James' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. James in a speedy trial.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. James

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 26, 2011
No. 11-208 GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. James

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT JAMES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

No. 11-208 GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)