United States v. Jacobs

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROGER JACOBS

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Crim. 22-36 (SDW) (D.N.J. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

Crim. 22-36 (SDW)

01-20-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROGER JACOBS

HONORABLE SUSAN D. WIGENTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENTENCINGS

HONORABLE SUSAN D. WIGENTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

In accordance with the operative COVID-19 standing orders, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

[√] That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[ ] Other: