From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jacob

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2003
84 F. App'x 781 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Submitted December 8, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding.

J. Richard Scruggs, Esq., USPO--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Alander L. Jacob, pro se, Federal Correctional Institution, Three Rivers, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.


Page 782.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Alander L. Jacob appeals the district court's denial of his motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have jurisdiction over this final judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm the district court's order.

Because Mr. Jacob's claim was not the proper subject of a Rule 36 motion, the district court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to resentence Mr. Jacob. See United States v. Penna, 319 F.3d 509, 513 (9th Cir.2003); United States v. Kaye, 739 F.2d 488, 490 (9th Cir.1984).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Jacob

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2003
84 F. App'x 781 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

United States v. Jacob

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Alander L. JACOB…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 2003

Citations

84 F. App'x 781 (9th Cir. 2003)