From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jackson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 25, 2016
No. 15-7813 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-7813

04-25-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway, Defendant - Appellant.

Andrew Charles Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1) Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Charles Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court's order denying his "Petition for Discovery of Voir Dire Examination Habeas Corpus § 121 Evidentiary Hearing." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Jackson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 25, 2016
No. 15-7813 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 25, 2016

Citations

No. 15-7813 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2016)