From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jackson

United States District Court for the District of Colorado
Nov 1, 2011
Case No: 06-cr-00494-CMA-01 (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: 06-cr-00494-CMA-01 USMNo: 34539-013

11-01-2011

United States of America v. ALAN JACKSON

Raymond P. Moore, FPD Defendant's Attorney


Date of Previous Judgment: May 9, 2008

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable)

Raymond P. Moore, FPD

Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of X the defendant D the Director of the Bureau of Prisons O the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[] DENIED. x GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 135 months is reduced to 120 months __________ as to each of Counts One and Two, to be served concurrently.

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Previous Offense ¦31 ¦Amended Offense Level:¦29 ¦ ¦Level: ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----------------------+---------------+----------------------+---------------¦ ¦Criminal History ¦III ¦Criminal History ¦m ¦ ¦Category: ¦ ¦Category: ¦ ¦ +----------------------+---------------+----------------------+---------------¦ ¦Previous Guideline ¦135 to 168 ¦Amended Guideline ¦120 to 135 ¦ ¦Range: ¦months ¦Range: ¦months ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

x The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

[] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.

[] Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated May 10, 2007, shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date: __________

(if different from order date)

__________

Judge's signature

Christine M. Arguello , United States District Judge

Printed name and title


Summaries of

United States v. Jackson

United States District Court for the District of Colorado
Nov 1, 2011
Case No: 06-cr-00494-CMA-01 (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. ALAN JACKSON

Court:United States District Court for the District of Colorado

Date published: Nov 1, 2011

Citations

Case No: 06-cr-00494-CMA-01 (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2011)