Opinion
CR No.: 0:98-1126-JFA
01-17-2012
ORDER
Upon motion of the defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG § 1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,
IT IS ORDERED that the motions (ECF No. 791 and 792) are DENIED. The defendant was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence of 240 months imprisonment for his conviction on Count 1 and 60 months for Count 2, consecutive. Whatever changes Amendment 750 might authorize in the underlying base offense level calculations, those Guideline changes cannot alter the ultimate statutory floor of 20 years imprisonment set by Congress.
The defendant's sentence was reduced to 252 months after receiving a 20% reduction from 240 months pursuant to Rule 35(b), (240 - 20% = 192 + 60 = 252).
IT IS SO ORDERED. January 17, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina
_____________
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.
United States District Judge