From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Jan 17, 2012
CR No.: 0:98-1126-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

CR No.: 0:98-1126-JFA

01-17-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADRIAN HOWARD JACKSON


ORDER

Upon motion of the defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG § 1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motions (ECF No. 791 and 792) are DENIED. The defendant was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence of 240 months imprisonment for his conviction on Count 1 and 60 months for Count 2, consecutive. Whatever changes Amendment 750 might authorize in the underlying base offense level calculations, those Guideline changes cannot alter the ultimate statutory floor of 20 years imprisonment set by Congress.

The defendant's sentence was reduced to 252 months after receiving a 20% reduction from 240 months pursuant to Rule 35(b), (240 - 20% = 192 + 60 = 252).

IT IS SO ORDERED. January 17, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina

_____________

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Jan 17, 2012
CR No.: 0:98-1126-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADRIAN HOWARD JACKSON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

CR No.: 0:98-1126-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2012)