United States v. Jackson

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHARIF JACKSON

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 12, 2024

Criminal 23-cr-00026-4 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2024)

Opinion

Criminal 23-cr-00026-4

01-12-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHARIF JACKSON

JOHN M. GALLAGHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

ORDER

JOHN M. GALLAGHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 12^th day of January, 2024, upon consideration of (1) the following motions filed by Defendant Sharif Jackson: (a) Motion for Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence, see ECF No. 130; (b) Motion to Compel Discovery, see ECF No. 131; (c) Motion for Government Agents to Retain Rough Notes, see ECF No. 132; (d) Motion for Early Production of Jencks Material, see ECF No. 133; (e) Motion to Join in Pretrial Motions Filed by Co-Defendants, see ECF No. 134; (f) Motion for Bill of Particulars, see ECF No. 135; (g) Motion in Limine to Bar Admission of all 404(b) Evidence, see ECF No. 159; (h) Motion in Limine to Exclude Other Crimes Evidence Under Rule 403 and Rule 404(b), see ECF No. 160; (i) Motion for Severance, see ECF No. 161; (j) Motion for a Daubert Hearing, see ECF No. 162; (k) Motion to Identify CoConspirator's Statements, see ECF No. 170; (1) Motion for Government's Expert Witnesses' Written Summaries, see ECF No. 171; (m) Motion to Extend the Filing Deadline for Additional Pretrial Motions, see ECF No. 180; and (n) Motion to Suppress Evidence from the Search Warrant for Defendant's Cell Phones, see ECF No. 211; (2) the Government's responses to all but two of Defendant's motions, see ECF Nos. 186, 209, 213; and (3) the evidence and arguments of counsel presented during an evidentiary hearing held on Defendant's pretrial motions on December 12, 2023; and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Motion for Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence (ECF No. 130) is DENIED AS MOOT;

2. The Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF No. 131) is DENIED AS MOOT;

3. The Motion for Government Agents to Retain Rough Notes (ECF No. 132) is DENIED;

4. The Motion for Early Production of Jencks Material (ECF No. 133) is DENIED AS MOOT;

5. The Motion to Join in Pretrial Motions Filed by Co-Defendants (ECF No. 134) is DENIED;

6. The Motion for Bill of Particulars (ECF No. 135) is DENIED;

7. The Motion in Limine to Bar Admission of all 404(b) Evidence (ECF No. 159) is DENIED;

8. The Motion in Limine to Exclude Other Crimes Evidence Under Rule 403 and Rule 404(b) (ECF No. 160) is DENIED;

9. The Motion for Severance (ECF No. 161) is DENIED;

10. The Motion for a Daubert Hearing (ECF No. 162) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

11. The Motion to Identify Co-Conspirator's Statements (ECF No. 170) is DENIED AS MOOT;

12. The Motion for Government's Expert Witness Written Summary (ECF No. 171) is DENIED AS MOOT;

13. The Motion to Extend the Filing Deadline for Additional Motions (ECF No. 180) is DENIED; and

14. The Motion to Suppress Evidence from the Search Warrant for Defendant's Cell Phones (ECF No. 211) is DENIED.