From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jackson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 22, 2005
147 F. App'x 690 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted September 12, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Elena J. Duarte, USLA--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stanley L. Friedman, Esq., Attorney at Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Florence Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-00-00722-FMC-4.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Shirley Ann Jackson appeals her 18-month sentence imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy, wire fraud, and mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 1343, and 1341. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Jackson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 22, 2005
147 F. App'x 690 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Shirley Ann JACKSON, aka…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 22, 2005

Citations

147 F. App'x 690 (9th Cir. 2005)