Opinion
No. 18-10123
03-19-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CEDRIC JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00098-LRH-2 MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada
Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Cedric Jackson appeals from the district court's judgment revoking his supervised release and challenges the 24-month sentence, which was ordered to run consecutive to the state sentence he is currently serving. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Jackson's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Jackson the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.