From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Itani

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 22, 2024
6:23-cr-104-RBD-EJK (M.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2024)

Opinion

6:23-cr-104-RBD-EJK

08-22-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BASIL SAMIR ITANI


ORDER

EMBRY J. KIDD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This cause comes before the Court on the Motion to Terminate Writ of Garnishment (the “Motion”) (Doc. 77), filed by the United States on August 12, 2024. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is due to be granted.

Defendant Basil Samir Itani (“Itani”) pleaded guilty to one count of distribution and dispensing of Oxycodone and Methadone outside the usual course of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C). (Docs. 41, 45, 51.) He was adjudicated guilty on this count (Doc. 52), and judgment was entered on December 21, 2023. (Doc. 64.) At sentencing, the Court required Itani to pay a $100.00 special assessment and a $50,000.00 fine. (Id. at 5.) On April 29, 2024, the United States filed an Application for Writ of Garnishment, requesting issuance of a writ of garnishment to Ameriprise Financial (“Garnishee”), compelling the Garnishee to pay to the United States all property held by the Garnishee in which Itani had a substantial nonexempt interest, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3613 and the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act (“FDCPA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 3002, 3202, and 3205. (Docs. 68 at 2; 68-1.) At the time of this Application for Writ of Garnishment, Itani's outstanding balance was $49,975.00. (Doc. 68 at 2.) Given Itani's outstanding balance and that the United States met the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 3205(b) for issuance of a writ of garnishment, this Court granted the government's Application for Writ of Garnishment. (Doc. 69.) The United States then filed the present Motion.

In the Motion, the United States requests that the Court terminate Itani's Writ of Garnishment since Itani has satisfied the balance of $49,975.00. (Doc. 77.) Because Itani has satisfied the balance, Itani's Writ of Garnishment directed towards Ameriprise Financial (Doc. 71) is no longer necessary.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 77) is GRANTED as follows:

a. The Writ of Garnishment (Doc. 71) is DISSOLVED and Garnishee, Ameriprise Financial, is DISCHARGED from liability under the Writ of Garnishment.

b. Garnishee, Ameriprise Financial, is DIRECTED to disburse any withheld funds pursuant to the Writ of Garnishment (Id.) to Basil Samir Itani.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Itani

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 22, 2024
6:23-cr-104-RBD-EJK (M.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Itani

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BASIL SAMIR ITANI

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Aug 22, 2024

Citations

6:23-cr-104-RBD-EJK (M.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2024)