From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Israel

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 24, 2023
Criminal 3:22-CR-304-S (N.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2023)

Opinion

Criminal 3:22-CR-304-S

04-24-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOMINIQUE ISRAEL


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DEFENDANT'S WAIVER OF RIGHT TO OBJECT

RENEE HARRIS TOLIVER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Defendant DOMINIQUE ISRAEL is charged in a Petition for Persons under Supervision (Petition) and Addendum to Petition for Persons Under for Persons under Supervision (Addendum), Docs. 4 & 8, with violating the terms of his supervised release. On this date, pursuant to the referral of the district judge, Doc. 20, the undersigned magistrate judge conducted a revocation hearing. Defendant appeared in person and represented by counsel, Assistant Federal Public Defendant Juan Rodriguez, and the United States appeared by and through Assistant United States Attorney Sarah Douglas.

Consistent with Defendant's Notice of Intent Regarding Revocation Hearing, Doc .26, he knowingly and voluntary pled true to the allegations contained in paragraphs II, III, IV, and V of the Petition and Addendum, and not true to the allegations contained in paragraph I of the Petition. Based on the pleas of true and the evidence proffered, it is the recommendation of the undersigned that the district judge find that Defendant violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in paragraphs II, III, IV and V of the Petition and Addendum; revoke Defendant's supervised release; and impose an additional term of imprisonment of ten months with no further term of supervised release to follow. It is also recommended that the Court recommend to the Bureau of Prisons that Defendant be permitted to serve his term at FCI Seagoville.

In open court, the magistrate judge informed Defendant that any recommendation of revocation of supervised release, and the imposition of any sentence, is subject to the approval of the United States District Judge, and that Defendant may object to the magistrate judge's recommendation before any additional sentence is imposed.

I, Defendant DOMINIQUE ISRAEL, hereby:

[√] waive my right to object to the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and any right to allocution before the district judge before sentence is imposed.

[ ] do NOT waive my right to object to the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and understand that I have 14 days to file written objections.


Summaries of

United States v. Israel

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 24, 2023
Criminal 3:22-CR-304-S (N.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Israel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOMINIQUE ISRAEL

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Apr 24, 2023

Citations

Criminal 3:22-CR-304-S (N.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2023)