From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Irons

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 29, 2024
No. 23-683 (9th Cir. Feb. 29, 2024)

Opinion

23-683

02-29-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RHETT IRONS, AKA Lucky, AKA Luck, Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted February 21, 2024

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00035-RAJ-1 Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

Rhett Irons appeals from the district court's amended judgment imposing a reduced sentence of 120 months following Irons's retrial and acquittal on one of the counts of conviction. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Irons's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Irons the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).


Summaries of

United States v. Irons

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 29, 2024
No. 23-683 (9th Cir. Feb. 29, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Irons

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RHETT IRONS, AKA Lucky…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 29, 2024

Citations

No. 23-683 (9th Cir. Feb. 29, 2024)