From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Insoo Kim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Jun 1, 2012
Case No.: CR 10-0171 RS (N.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: CR 10-0171 RS

06-01-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. INSOO KIM, Defendant.

MARTIN A. SCHAINBAUM (CSBN 37257) BRYANT W.H. SMITH (CSBN 250035) ANDREW ALLEN (CSBN 269502) Attorneys for Defendant


MARTIN A. SCHAINBAUM (CSBN 37257)

BRYANT W.H. SMITH (CSBN 250035)

ANDREW ALLEN (CSBN 269502)

Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO MOVE SURRENDER DATE

TO OCTOBER 22, 2012


STIPULATION

The Court ordered Defendant to surrender himself to the custody of the U.S. Marshalls on August 15, 2012. The United States and Defendant, through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree for Defendant's surrender date to be moved from August 15, 2012 to October 22, 2012.

In support of the parties' stipulation, Defendant states that:

1. An October 22, 2012 surrender date is likely to be less damaging to Melody Painting's business than the previously-ordered August 15, 2012 surrender date.

2. The August 15, 2012 surrender date would be a hardship for Defendant because of its impact on Defendant's work at Melody Painting during the summer season. Accordingly, the October 22, 2012 surrender date would lessen the impact on the business of Melody Painting.

Respectfully submitted,

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

_________________________

THOMAS MOORE

Assistant United States Attorney

MARTIN A. SCHAINBAUM

A Professional Law Corporation

_________________________

MARTIN SCHAINBAUM

Counsel for Plaintiffs

ORDER

Based on the above agreement and stipulation of the parties to this action, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant surrender himself to the custody of the U.S. Marshall Service on October 22, 2012, in lieu of the previously-ordered August 15, 2012 surrender date.

_________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Insoo Kim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Jun 1, 2012
Case No.: CR 10-0171 RS (N.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Insoo Kim

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. INSOO KIM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Jun 1, 2012

Citations

Case No.: CR 10-0171 RS (N.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2012)

Citing Cases

U. S. v. Koerber

Due process was implicated in Bridges (and Heffner and Leahey, neither of which, incidentally, were cited by…