From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Iimas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 13, 2022
2:1 Cr. 316 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:1 Cr. 316 (PMH)

12-13-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICKIE IIMAS, Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York DEREK WIKSTROM Assistant United States Attorney MICKIE IIMAS DEVERAUX CANNICK, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant


DAMIAN WILLIAMS

United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York

DEREK WIKSTROM

Assistant United States Attorney

MICKIE IIMAS

DEVERAUX CANNICK, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE PHILIP M. HALPERN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

WHEREAS, on or about May 11, 2021, MICKIE IIMAS (the “Defendant”), was charged in a three-count Information, 21 Cr. 316 (PMH) (the “Indictment”), with, among other things, possession of narcotics with intent to distribute, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841 (Count One);

WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, of any and all property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment and any and all property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or pail, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained;

WHEREAS, on or about May 4, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, a sum of money equal 1 to $4,419.00, representing the gross proceeds received by the Defendant pursuant to his narcotics trafficking as alleged in Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $4,419.00 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney Derek Wikstrom, of counsel, and the Defendant and his counsel, Deveraux Cannick, Esq., that:

1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $4,419.00 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant MICKIE UMAS, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals 2 Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 3

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED. 4


Summaries of

United States v. Iimas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 13, 2022
2:1 Cr. 316 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Iimas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICKIE IIMAS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 13, 2022

Citations

2:1 Cr. 316 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2022)