United States v. Iggal Copeland

Full title: UNITED STATES v. IGGAL COPELAND

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jun 22, 2021

Crim. 21-432 (D.N.J. Jun. 22, 2021)

Opinion

Crim. 21-432

06-22-2021

UNITED STATES v. IGGAL COPELAND

Hon. Susan D. Wigenton United States District Judge

ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

Hon. Susan D. Wigenton United States District Judge

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[X] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[X] Video Teleconferencing

[] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] Other: