From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ibrahim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 26, 2012
Case No. 3:10-00260-15 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-00260-15

04-26-2012

UNITED STATES, Plaintiff v. DAHIR NOR IBRAHIM, Defendant


Hon. Haynes


MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF MOHAMED ABDULGADIR AHMED

Defendant moves to strike the direct testimony of the government's witness, Mohamed Abdulgadir Ahmed, for improper reading of his grand jury transcript at government's invitation.

Witnesses may not use a prior statement as a reading tool without the prerequisite foundation of lack of memory and that the reading would refresh that memory under FRE 612.

In support of this motion, Defendant makes reference to his Brief in Support of his Motion to Strike the testimony of Muna Abdulakadir Mohamud for the applicable case law and the cross examination of Attorney Jennifer Thompson clearly showing that the witness had no failure of memory and yet was allowed to read his Grand Jury transcript.

Respectfully submitted,

______________________

Jerry Gonzalez (18379)

Attorney for Defendant (15)

2441-Q Old Fort Parkway

No. 381

Murfreesboro TN 37128

615-360-6060

jgonzalez@jglaw.net


Summaries of

United States v. Ibrahim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 26, 2012
Case No. 3:10-00260-15 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 26, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Ibrahim

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Plaintiff v. DAHIR NOR IBRAHIM, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:10-00260-15 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 26, 2012)