From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Iaquinta

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 15, 2014
581 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-6236

08-15-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, v. ALBERT F. IAQUINTA, Respondent - Appellant.

James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, R.A. Renfer, Jr., Robert J. Dodson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:98-hc-007 64-BR) Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, R.A. Renfer, Jr., Robert J. Dodson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Albert F. Iaquinta appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4247(h) (West 2012 & Supp. 2014) to determine whether he should be discharged. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Iaquinta

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 15, 2014
581 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Iaquinta

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, v. ALBERT F. IAQUINTA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 15, 2014

Citations

581 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. MacLaren

But the court need not accept as true legal conclusions phrased as factual allegations, "unwarranted…