From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hynes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 11, 2013
No. CR 12-00486-WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 12-00486-WHA

03-11-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN KIERAN HYNES, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T) Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division Attorneys for United States of America


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T)
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
Attorneys for United States of America

STIPULATION TO DISCLOSE GRAND

JURY INFORMATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

For the reason that the trial of this matter is set for March 25, 2013, and because the United States and the defendant are preparing this matter for trial and because they are also attempting to resolve this matter,

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff United States of America and Defendant John Kieran Hynes, through their respective counsel, as follows:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3500 the Untied States may, at this time, disclose any Rule 6(e) grand jury testimony of its anticipated trial witnesses to defendant's counsel for use in the preparation and trial of this matter, and at the conclusion of the trial of this matter or upon entry of a guilty plea in this matter, defendant's counsel shall destroy such information; and

2. In the event the defendant enters a guilty plea in this matter, the United States Attorney may disclose any grand jury information in this matter to the Internal Revenue Service for its use in the determination and litigation of any civil tax obligations arising from the investigation and prosecution of this matter.

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney
______________
JOHN YOUNGQUIST
Attorney for the Defendant
______________
THOMAS MOORE
Assistant United States Attorney

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

William Alsup


Summaries of

United States v. Hynes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 11, 2013
No. CR 12-00486-WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Hynes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN KIERAN HYNES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

No. CR 12-00486-WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)