From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hylton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Mar 13, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1543(JCH) (D. Conn. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1543(JCH)

03-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, and TAIKA BILBO, ET AL Interveners, v. CLIFTON HYLTON, ET AL, Defendants.


RULING RE: JOINT MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 75)

The court denies the Motion to Strike the Defendants' Amended Answer to the Complaint (Doc. No. 75), filed by the United States of America and the intervenors Taika Bilbo, Jermaine Bilbo, and Demechia Wilson, for the reasons originally stated on the record at the pretrial conference on March 12, 2013. The court stands by its original Ruling because it also finds that the defendants' objection to the introduction of Plaintiffs' Exhibit 11—defendants' original answer (Doc. No. 27)—has no merit. See Defs.' Objections (Doc. No. 77) at 1. The defendants' objection to Plaintiffs' Exhibit 11 is overruled.

SO ORDERED.

Dated at New Haven, Connecticut this 13th day of March, 2013.

________________________

Janet C. Hall

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hylton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Mar 13, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1543(JCH) (D. Conn. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Hylton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, and TAIKA BILBO, ET AL Interveners…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1543(JCH) (D. Conn. Mar. 13, 2013)