From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hyland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 2, 2013
No. CR 13-0176 CRB (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 13-0176 CRB

05-02-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. EMMANUEL IMANI HYLAND, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division CYNTHIA M. FREY (DCBN 475889) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America ELIZABETH FALK Attorney for EMMANUEL IMANI HYLAND


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
CYNTHIA M. FREY (DCBN 475889)
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the United States of America

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND FOR AN

EXCLUSION OF TIME FROM

CALCULATIONS UNDER THE SPEEDY

TRIAL ACT

The defendant, Emanuel Imani Hyland, represented by Elizabeth Falk, and the government, represented by Cynthia Frey, Assistant United States Attorney, are currently scheduled for a status conference before this Court on May 2, 2013. The government is not available on that date. The parties are discussing a potential resolution of this case and request a continuance to June 12, 2013. The Courtroom Deputy has confirmed availability on that date. As such, the parties stipulate to set the next status conference before this Court on June 12, 2013. The defendant agrees to exclude time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161, the Speedy Trial Act.

The defendant also agrees that an exclusion of time is appropriate under the Speedy Trial Act between May 2, 2013 and June 12, 2013 for purposes of effective preparation of counsel, in order to provide defense counsel with adequate time to review the discovery, conduct an investigation, and consult with the defendant. In addition, the defendant agrees to exclude for this period of time any time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The parties represent that granting the continuance, in order to provide defense counsel with adequate time to review the discovery, conduct additional investigation, and consult with the defendant, is necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). SO STIPULATED:

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

_______________

CYNTHIA M. FREY

Assistant United States Attorney

_______________

ELIZABETH FALK

Attorney for EMMANUEL IMANI HYLAND

Based upon the representation of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that good cause exists to continue the status conference to June 12, 2013 and to exclude time between May 2, 2013 and June 12, 2013. The Court finds that failing to exclude the time between May 2, 2013 and June 12, 2013 would unreasonably deny the defendant and counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between May 2, 2013 and June 12, 2013 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The status conference be continued to June 12, 2013; and

(2) The time between May 2, 2013 and June 12, 2013 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

_______________

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hyland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 2, 2013
No. CR 13-0176 CRB (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Hyland

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. EMMANUEL IMANI HYLAND, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

No. CR 13-0176 CRB (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)