From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hutz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2012
CR. NO. S-10-0238 EJG (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CR. NO. S-10-0238 EJG

01-13-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THEODORE B. HUTZ, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney RUSSELL L. CARLBERG Assistant U.S. Attorney ANNA TRYON PLETCHER TAI S. MILDER Trial Attorneys U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division Sharis A. Pozen Acting Assistant Attorney General Kresta Daly* By: KRESTA DALY Counsel for Defendant *Signed with permission.


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

RUSSELL L. CARLBERG

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ANNA TRYON PLETCHER

TAI S. MILDER

Trial Attorneys

U.S. Department of Justice

Antitrust Division

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

On December 15, 2011, the Court issued an order relating Mr. Hutz's case to United States v. Chandler, et al., Cr. No. S-11-511 EJG. Related Case Order, Dkt. 31. The five defendants charged in United States v. Chandler, Wiley C. Chandler, Andrew B. Katakis, Donald M. Parker, Anthony B. Joaquim, and W. Theodore Longley, are set to appear before the Court on January 27, 2012.

Mr. Hutz is also presently scheduled to appear on January 27, 2012 for a Status Conference regarding Judgment and Sentencing. Mr. Hutz, however, may be called as a witness at the trial of the defendants in United States v. Chandler. As such, the government will not be able to fully determine its sentencing recommendation until such trial.

Per agreement with the government and defense counsel, it is respectfully requested that the status conference currently set for January 27, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. be continued to April 27, 2012. The United States Probation Office is in accord with this approach. It is anticipated that at that time, the parties will be in a better position to request a new Judgment and Sentencing date and disclosure schedule for the pre-sentence report.

Respectfully Submitted,

Benjamin B. Wagner

United States Attorney

By: Russell Carlberg*

RUSSELL L. CARLBERG

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Sharis A. Pozen

Acting Assistant Attorney General

By: Anna Pletcher

ANNA TRYON PLETCHER

TAI S. MILDER

Trial Attorneys

Antitrust Division

Kresta Daly*

By: KRESTA DALY

Counsel for Defendant

*Signed with permission.

ORDER

For the reasons stated above, the Court reschedules the status conference regarding judgment and sentence to April 27, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

EDWARD J. GARCIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hutz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2012
CR. NO. S-10-0238 EJG (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hutz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THEODORE B. HUTZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 13, 2012

Citations

CR. NO. S-10-0238 EJG (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)