Opinion
CRIMINAL 1:19-cr-00087-MR-WCM-2
11-14-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KRISTOFF MICHAEL HUNTER, Defendant.
ORDER
Martin Reidinger Chief United States District Judge
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's letter, which the Court construes as an inquiry of eligibility for sentencing relief. [Doc. 112].
In his letter, the Defendant asks the Court to advise him if any of the recent amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines “are applicable to [his] case.” [Id. at 1].
The Defendant's request is denied. If the Defendant wishes to seek any relief pursuant to a particular amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines, he must do so by filing a motion setting out a specific claim for relief. The Defendant is further cautioned that, in the future, he must seek relief from the Court by way of a motion. Letters and other miscellaneous documents will not receive a response.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's letter, which the Court construes as an inquiry of eligibility for sentencing relief [Doc. 112], is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.