From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hull

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 1, 1971
441 F.2d 1165 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

Nos. 26519, 26520.

May 10, 1971. Rehearing Denied July 1, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Robert C. Belloni, Judge.

George W. Hunt (appeared), of Humphreys Hunt, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Hull.

Wesley C. Blake (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant Munds.

Brian E. Michaels (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Harry Steward, U.S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Crim. Div., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges; and REAL, District Judge.

The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.


The judgments of conviction are affirmed. We find no error.

United States v. Markham, 9 Cir., 440 F.2d 1119, decided April 12, 1971, answers the principal contention made here.

The mandate will issue now.


Summaries of

United States v. Hull

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 1, 1971
441 F.2d 1165 (9th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

United States v. Hull

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Preston HULL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 1, 1971

Citations

441 F.2d 1165 (9th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

United States v. Dixon

As to the necessity of preserving material footprints, the point is a good jury argument, but such procedure…