From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hul

United States District Court, District of New Jersey
Jul 15, 2021
CRIM. 19-748-BRM (D.N.J. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

CRIM. 19-748-BRM

07-15-2021

UNITED STATES v. DAVID HUL


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENTENCINGS

Honorable Brian R. Martinotti United States District Judge

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceedings) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

[] That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

1) COVID-19 Pandemic; 2) Consent of Defendant and Defendant's desire to proceed at this time; and 3) To permit the United States to obtain a resolution of the case.

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[] Video Teleconferencing

[] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Hul

United States District Court, District of New Jersey
Jul 15, 2021
CRIM. 19-748-BRM (D.N.J. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Hul

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. DAVID HUL

Court:United States District Court, District of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

CRIM. 19-748-BRM (D.N.J. Jul. 15, 2021)