From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Huff

United States District Court for District of New Jersey
May 16, 2012
No.: 10-4040 (CCC) (D.N.J. May. 16, 2012)

Opinion

No.: 10-4040 (CCC)

05-16-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. NATONYA HUFF, Defendant.


Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision


Name of Offender: Yoo Mi Evans Docket Number: 08 CR 0477-001

PACTS Number: 33311

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: Honorable William H. Walls

Date of Original Sentence: 04/09/09 States.

Original Sentence: Four years probation, DNA test

Original Offense: Conspiracy to defraud the Uniteding, $35,027 fine and twelve months location monitoring.

Type of Supervision: Probation Date Supervision Commenced: 04/09/09

Assistant US. Attorney: Lisa M. Colone, 970 Broad Street, Room S02 Newark, New Jersey 07)02 (973) 645-2700

Defense Attorney: Cathy Waldor, 2517 Hwy. 35, Building L, Suite 101, Manasquan, New Jersey 08736 (732) 528-5040

PETITIONING THE COURT

[x] To issue a warrant

[] To issue a summons

The probation officer believes that the offender has violated the following conditions) of supervision:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Violation¦Nature of Noncompliance ¦ ¦Number ¦ ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦The offender has violated the standard supervision condition which ¦ ¦ ¦states 'Yon shall not commit another federal, state, or local ¦ ¦ ¦crime.' ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦1 ¦On February 13, 2012, Ms. Evans was arrested in Queens, New York by¦ ¦ ¦the New York City Police Department and charged with kidnaping, ¦ ¦ ¦robbery and unlawful imprisonment The offender was released this ¦ ¦ ¦same date after a posting a $50,000 bail. Her initial hearing was ¦ ¦ ¦scheduled for March 3, 2012 in Queens County Supreme Court, with ¦ ¦ ¦next court date being undetermined at this time. ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is ture and correct.

By: Stanley K. Whecstone

Senior US. Probation Officer

THE COURT ORDERS:

[√] The Issuance of a Warrant
[] The Issuance of a Summons. Date of Hearing: ___.
[] No Action
[] Other

_______________

Signature of Judicial Officer

_______________

Date

ORDER FOR MODIFICATION

CONDITIONS OF BAIL

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the application of defendant Natonya Huff (by Stacy a. Biancamano, Arleo, Donohue & Biancamano, L.L.C.) for modification of the conditions of defendant's bail, and the United States (by Sharon Ashe, Assistant United States Attorney) consenting to the entry of the Order; and United States Pretrial Services Officer (by Adrienne Smith) having no objection: and for good cause shown;

IT IS on this 16 day of May, 2012;

HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's bail be modified as follows:

1. Natonya Huff travel is no longer restricted to New York and New Jersey. She shall be permitted to travel within the United States with permission of pretrial.
2. Should she travel out of the tri-state area, she shall provide an itinerary to pretrial in advance of said travel.
3. All other conditions of defendant's bail shall remain in Jim force and effect.

_______________

Honorable Patty Shwartz. S.M.J.


Summaries of

United States v. Huff

United States District Court for District of New Jersey
May 16, 2012
No.: 10-4040 (CCC) (D.N.J. May. 16, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Huff

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. NATONYA HUFF, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court for District of New Jersey

Date published: May 16, 2012

Citations

No.: 10-4040 (CCC) (D.N.J. May. 16, 2012)