From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hudson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2011
CR. 11-0515-EMC (NMC) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CR. 11-0515-EMC (NMC)

11-02-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN LEE HUDSON Defendant

RANDY SUE POLLOCK Attorney at Law (CSBN 64493) Attorney for Defendant JOHN LEE HUDSON


RANDY SUE POLLOCK

Attorney at Law (CSBN 64493)

Attorney for Defendant

JOHN LEE HUDSON

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE-SETTING STATUS

CONFERENCE AND

DOCUMENTING EXCLUSION OF

TIME

Randy Sue Pollock, counsel for John Lee Hudson, and Damali Taylor, Assistant

United States Attorney , hereby stipulate to continue the pretrial status conference presently set for November 3, 2011 to December 14, 2011 at 2:30 p.m. This continuance is based on defense counsel's appearance in federal court in Sacramento on November 3rd at 2 p.m. [United States vs. Stewart, et al, CR. 11-454-GEB]. Additionally, government counsel is going to be providing the defense with additional discovery to review in addition to the recent 1500 text messages which will require the need for additional time..

Based on these facts, the parties believe that the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases, continuing the status conference from November 3, 2011 to December 14, 2011 is necessary for effective preparation of counsel as well as continuity of counsel. 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Given these circumstances, the Court shall find that the ends of justice served by excluding the period of time from November 3, 2011 to December 14, 2011 outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speed trial. 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(A).

Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court orders that the period from November 3, 2011 to December 14, 2011, be excluded from Speedy Trial calculations under 18 U.S.C. Sections 3161(h)(1)(D) and 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

SO STIPULATED.

RANDY SUE POLLOCK

Counsel for Defendant

John Lee Hudson

DAMALI TAYLOR

Assistant United States Attorney

Judge Edward M. Chen

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Hudson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2011
CR. 11-0515-EMC (NMC) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN LEE HUDSON Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 2, 2011

Citations

CR. 11-0515-EMC (NMC) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)