From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hudson

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jul 2, 2012
685 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2012)

Summary

noting that the Supreme Court in Dorsey resolved in this circuit whether the Fair Sentencing Act "applies to defendants sentenced after the Act's effective date of August 3, 2010, but whose conduct occurred before that date"

Summary of this case from United States v. Marshall

Opinion

Nos. 10–14428 10–14662.

2012-07-2

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Charles Levern HUDSON, Defendant–Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Carmelina Vera Rojas, Defendant–Appellant.

Lanny A. Breuer (Court–Appointed), U.S. DOJ, Joshua Stephen Johnson, U.S. DOJ, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, Lisa A. Hirsch, Anne Ruth Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Kathleen Mary Salyer, William C. Healy, Kelly S. Karase, U.S. Attorney's Office, Miami, FL, Rinku Talwar Tribuiani, U.S. Attorney's Office, Fort Pierce, FL, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Bernardo Lopez, Fed. Pub. Defender's Office, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Michael Caruso, Fed. Pub. Def., Fed. Pub. Defender's Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant–Appellant in No. 10–14428.


Lanny A. Breuer (Court–Appointed), U.S. DOJ, Joshua Stephen Johnson, U.S. DOJ, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, Lisa A. Hirsch, Anne Ruth Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Kathleen Mary Salyer, William C. Healy, Kelly S. Karase, U.S. Attorney's Office, Miami, FL, Rinku Talwar Tribuiani, U.S. Attorney's Office, Fort Pierce, FL, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Bernardo Lopez, Fed. Pub. Defender's Office, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Michael Caruso, Fed. Pub. Def., Fed. Pub. Defender's Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant–Appellant in No. 10–14428.
Sowmya Bharathi, Michael Caruso, Fed. Pub. Def., Fed. Pub. Defender's Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant–Appellant in No. 10–14662.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Nos. 2:07–cr–14081–KMM–1, 1:10–cr–20236–AJ–2); K. Michael Moore, Adalberto Jordan, Judges.
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, FAY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Senior United States Circuit Judges Peter T. Fay and R. Lanier Anderson, III, elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

United States Circuit Judge Adalberto Jordan is recused from participating in the matter pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 47.

Prior report: 645 F.3d 1234; 426 Fed.Appx. 748; 727 F.Supp.2d 1376. BY THE COURT:

We previously vacated the panels' opinions to rehear these appeals en banc. United States v. Rojas, 659 F.3d 1055 (11th Cir.2011); United States v. Hudson, 659 F.3d 1056 (11th Cir.2011). The issue before us in both cases was whether the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which raised the quantities of crack cocaine required to trigger mandatory-minimum penalties under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1), applies to defendants sentenced after the Act's effective date of August 3, 2010, but whose conduct occurred before that date.

On June 21, 2012, the United States Supreme Court answered the question and held that the more lenient mandatory-minimums in the Act do apply to all of those defendants sentenced after August 3, 2010, when the Act took effect. Dorsey v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 2321, 183 L.Ed.2d 250 (2012).

Accordingly, we now vacate the defendants' sentences, and remand both appeals back to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for re-sentencing consistent with the decision by the Supreme Court.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Hudson

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jul 2, 2012
685 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2012)

noting that the Supreme Court in Dorsey resolved in this circuit whether the Fair Sentencing Act "applies to defendants sentenced after the Act's effective date of August 3, 2010, but whose conduct occurred before that date"

Summary of this case from United States v. Marshall

noting that the Supreme Court in Dorsey resolved in this circuit whether the Fair Sentencing Act "applies to defendants sentenced after the Act's effective date of August 3, 2010, but whose conduct occurred before that date"

Summary of this case from United States v. Johnson

noting that the Supreme Court in Dorsey resolved in this circuit whether the Fair Sentencing Act "applies to defendants sentenced after the Act's effective date of August 3, 2010, but whose conduct occurred before that date"

Summary of this case from United States v. Murray
Case details for

United States v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Charles Levern HUDSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

Citations

685 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2012)
23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1250

Citing Cases

United States v. Jones

In 2011, the same base offense level encompassed offenses involving from 28 to 112 grams of cocaine base.…

United States v. Hinds

Id. While we have applied Dorsey in vacating the sentences of defendants who were sentenced post-FSA for…