From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Howard

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 24, 2024
No. 24-20151 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 24, 2024)

Opinion

24-20151

07-24-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MAHDI HOWARD, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

DAVID M. LAWSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter is before the Court on a stipulation for substitution of counsel for the defendant. According to the terms of the stipulation, attorney Haralambos D. Mihas will substitute as counsel of record for the defendant in place of attorney Sanford Schulman. The Court has considered the stipulation and finds that it should be granted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the stipulation for substitution of counsel (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED. Attorney Sanford Schulman's appearance as counsel of record for the defendant is WITHDRAWN, and he is discharged from any further responsibility to the Court in this matter.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant's motion for withdrawal of attorney Sanford Schulman (ECF No. 36) is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

United States v. Howard

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 24, 2024
No. 24-20151 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 24, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MAHDI HOWARD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 24, 2024

Citations

No. 24-20151 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 24, 2024)