From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Housley

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 21, 2022
2:22-cr-0161-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cr-0161-RFB-VCF

10-21-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN HOUSLEY, aka Robert White Defendant.

JASON M. FRIERSON, United States Attorney. JESS MARCHESE, Counsel for Defendant. ROBERT KNIEF, Assistant United States Attorney.


JASON M. FRIERSON, United States Attorney.

JESS MARCHESE, Counsel for Defendant.

ROBERT KNIEF, Assistant United States Attorney.

STIPULATION TO RESET DEADLINE (FIRST REQUEST)

HONORABLE RICHARD F. BOULWARE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Jason M. Frierson, United States Attorney, and Robert Knief, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Jess Marchese, counsel for defendant Christopher Stephen Housley, that the deadline for the filing of the government's response to the defendant's Motion to Join and Sever (ECF No. 21), be reset from October 23, 2022 to October 30, 2022.

This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Due to other motions practice, case preparation, and health issues, government counsel has not had the opportunity to adequately research and respond to the issues raised in the defense motion.

2. Defendant is not in custody and does not object to the continuance.

3. For the reasons stated above, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the government deadline.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. This is the first request for a continuance filed herein.

ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based upon the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Due to other motions practice, case preparation, and health issues, government counsel has not had the opportunity to adequately research and respond to the issues raised in the defense motion.

2. Defendant is not in custody and does not object to the continuance.

3. For the reasons stated above, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the government deadline.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

ORDER

It is therefore ORDERED that the Government's reply regarding defendant's Motion to for Consolidation, Severance and Request to Transfer Suppress(ECF No. 21), is due on the 30th day of October 2022.


Summaries of

United States v. Housley

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 21, 2022
2:22-cr-0161-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Housley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN HOUSLEY, aka Robert White…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

Citations

2:22-cr-0161-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)