Opinion
2:12-cr-00472-JAD-CWH
08-25-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY HOROVITZ, Defendant.
CLARK HILL PLLC PAOLA M. ARMENI Nevada Bar No. 8357 GIA N. MARINA Nevada Bar No. 15276 Attorneys for Defendant, Anthony Horovitz SUMMER A. JOHNSON Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CLARK HILL PLLC PAOLA M. ARMENI Nevada Bar No. 8357 GIA N. MARINA Nevada Bar No. 15276 Attorneys for Defendant, Anthony Horovitz
SUMMER A. JOHNSON Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE DATE TO RESPOND TO GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR INSTALLMENT PAYMENT ORDER [48] FOURTH REQUEST
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Anthony Horovitz, Defendant, by and through his counsel, Paola M. Armeni, Esq., and Gia N. Marina, Esq., of the law firm of Clark Hill, PLLC, and the Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through Jason Frierson, United States Attorney, and Summer A. Johnson, Assistant United States Attorney, to extend the time for the Defendant to respond to Government's Motion for Installment Payment Order [DKT 48], filed on July 7, 2022.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline for filing any response be extended up to and including September 14, 2022.
This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:
1. The Response deadline date is August 24, 2022 [DKT 54].
2. The law firm of Clark Hill PLLC was retained on July 14, 2022.
3. Defense Counsel is in constant communication with the Government working toward an effective resolution for all parties.
4. For these reasons, the parties agree that the Response to the Motion for Installment Payment Order will be filed on September 14, 2022.
5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay and the denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
6. For all of the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would be best served by the continuance of the Response to Motion for Installment Payment Order.
7. This is a Fourth Request for a continuance of the response to the Motion for Installment Payment Order.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW AND ORDER
Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the
Court hereby finds that:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Based on the fact that counsel has agreed to a continuance, the Court hereby concludes that:
1. The Response deadline date is August 24, 2022 [DKT 54].
2. The law firm of Clark Hill PLLC was retained on July 14, 2022.
3. Defense Counsel is in constant communication with the Government working toward an effective resolution for all parties.
4. For these reasons, the parties agree that the Response to the Motion for Installment Payment Order will be filed on September 14, 2022.
5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay and the denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
6. For all of the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would be best served by the continuance of the Response to Motion for Installment Payment Order.
7. This is a Fourth Request for a continuance of the response to the Motion for Installment Payment Order.
8. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes or delay and the denial of the denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
9. For all of the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would be best served by the continuance of the Response to Motion for Installment Payment Order.
10. This is a Fourth Request for a continuance of the response to the Motion for Installment Payment Order.
11. The ends of justice are served by granting said continuances and outweigh the best interest of the public and since the failure to grant said continuances would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, as it would deny the parties herein sufficient time, and the opportunity, within which to effectively and thoroughly prepare and file responses, and replies, and taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
ORDER
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines for filing of responsive pleading, is hereby due on or before the 14th day of September, 2022.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines for filing a reply is hereby due on or before the 21st day of September, 2022.