From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hornbuckle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. CR. S-11-327 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. CR. S-11-327 MCE

01-04-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TYNISHA HORNBUCKLE, et al., Defendants.

BRUCE LOCKE Attorney for Tynisha Hornbuckle Bruce Locke MICHAEL L. CHASTAINE Attorney for Tamrell Hornbuckle Bruce Locke OLAF WILLIAM HEDBERG Attorney for Latrelle Hornbuckle Bruce Locke RONALD JAMES PETERS Attorney for Cherrelle Hornbuckle Bruce Locke TIMOTHY E. WARRINER Attorney for Tammy Brown Bruce Locke For KYLE REARDON Attorney for the United States


BRUCE LOCKE (#177787)

Moss & Locke

800 Howe Avenue, Suite 110

Attorneys for

TYNISHA HORNBUCKLE

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the defendants, Tynisha Hornbuckle, Tamrell Hornbuckle, Latrelle Hornbuckle, Cherrelle Hornbuckle, and Tammy Brown, by and through their undersigned defense counsel, and the United States of America by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kyle Reardon, that the status conference presently set for January 5, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., should be continued to February 16, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from January 5, 2012 through February 16, 2012.

The reason for the continuance is the defense needs additional time to complete potential plea negotiations and to prepare for trial. The case is currently set for trial on June 4, 2012. Accordingly, the time between January 5, 2012 and February 16, 2012 should be excluded from the Speedy Trial calculation pursuant to Title 18, States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4 for defense preparation. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A). Mr. Chastaine, Mr. Hedberg, Mr. Peters, Mr. Warriner, and Mr. Reardon have authorized Mr. Locke to sign this pleading for them. .

_________________

BRUCE LOCKE

Attorney for Tynisha Hornbuckle

Bruce Locke

MICHAEL L. CHASTAINE

Attorney for Tamrell Hornbuckle

Bruce Locke

OLAF WILLIAM HEDBERG

Attorney for Latrelle Hornbuckle

Bruce Locke

RONALD JAMES PETERS

Attorney for Cherrelle Hornbuckle

Bruce Locke

TIMOTHY E. WARRINER

Attorney for Tammy Brown

Bruce Locke

For KYLE REARDON

Attorney for the United States

The Court finds, for the reasons stated above, that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, and, therefore,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hornbuckle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. CR. S-11-327 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hornbuckle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TYNISHA HORNBUCKLE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

No. CR. S-11-327 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)