From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hopson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 3, 2012
Criminal No. 08-216 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal No. 08-216

12-03-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY HOPSON, Defendant/petitioner.


See Civil Action No. 12-1265


ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2012, upon consideration of the Government's "Motion for Miscellaneous Relief" (Document No. 128) filed in the above-captioned matter on November 15, 2012,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said motion is GRANTED. Petitioner's attorney in this case, William Kaczynski, shall file, no later than December 28, 2012, an affidavit concerning the nature of any communications with Petitioner in regard to the decision as to whether Petitioner would testify at the trial in this matter, which have been put at issue as a result of the motion filed by Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Document No. 122).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may file any response to Attorney Kaczynski's affidavit no later than January 21, 2013.

In his motion, Petitioner has alleged that his counsel was ineffective in several regards, including in not permitting him to testify at trial, or in advising him not to do so. In raising this issue and placing the advice of counsel at issue, Petitioner has waived any attorney-client privilege as to his communications with counsel in this regard. See Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co., 32 F.3d 851, 863 (3d Cir. 1994); United States v. Scalise, 2012 WL 2367849, at *6 (W.D. Pa. June 21, 2012). The waiver covers all communications with counsel necessary to prove or disprove his claims. See United States v. Pinson, 584 P.3d 972, 977-79 (10th Cir. 2009) (collecting cases). Accordingly, by claiming that counsel was ineffective in not permitting him to testify, or in advising him not to do so, Petitioner has waived his privilege in regard to discussions with counsel relating to this issue.

While communications between Petitioner and counsel may bear on other claims raised by Petitioner in his Section 2255 motion, the Government's motion only references communications regarding the decision as to whether Petitioner would testify at trial. Accordingly, the Court will limit the relief to this matter.

Alan N. Bloch

United States District Judge
ecf: Counsel of record

William Kaczynski, Esquire, at kazlawpgh@aol.com
cc: Anthony Hopson, #09883-068

FCI Ft. Dix

P.O. Box 200 (Camp)

Fort Dix, NJ 08640


Summaries of

United States v. Hopson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 3, 2012
Criminal No. 08-216 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hopson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY HOPSON, Defendant/petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 3, 2012

Citations

Criminal No. 08-216 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)