From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Holmes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
2:14-cr-00317-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:14-cr-00317-MCE-AC

06-09-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY HOLMES, Movant.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Movant, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 23, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 104. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 23, 2021, ECF No. 104, are ADOPTED in full;

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 84, is GRANTED and movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, ECF No. 71, is DISMISSED as untimely.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Holmes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
2:14-cr-00317-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY HOLMES, Movant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

2:14-cr-00317-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)