From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Holmes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Sep 16, 2015
CASE NO: 3:14-cr-21-J-32PDB (M.D. Fla. Sep. 16, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO: 3:14-cr-21-J-32PDB

09-16-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL HOLMES


ORDER

This case is before the Court sua sponte. As the parties are aware, the Court has under active consideration Defendant Michael Holmes's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 24). The Court has taken longer than usual to decide the motion to suppress, which raises difficult questions of Fourth Amendment law for which there are no ready answers. Though no party has brought it to the Court's attention, the Court has recently become aware that the "speedy trial clock" of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174, may have begun to run during the Court's consideration of the motion and may, arguably, have run out. See Henderson v. United States, 476 U.S. 321 (1986); United States v. Jones, 601 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2010); United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir. 1983); also 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D), (H), (h)(7).

Before the Court makes any such determination, the parties should advise whether they believe the speedy trial deadline has passed and, if so, when. The parties should also address whether the Court should dismiss the indictment with or without prejudice in the event the deadline has passed. In the meantime, the defendant's motion to suppress will remain under active consideration.

The Court has directed that the record of the April 27, 2015 hearing be transcribed and filed for the parties' reference in determining their positions. The Court is interested to know, among other things, whether the parties believe the Court made a sufficient "ends of justice" finding under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), during the hearing. --------

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, on or before October 2, 2015, the defendant and the United States shall each file a brief as requested in this Order.

DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida this 16th day of September, 2015.

/s/_________

TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN

United States District Judge
bjb.
Copies:
Michael Coolican, AUSA
Cherie L. Krigsman, AUSA
Janet Ellen Johnson, Esquire
Jesse Nolan Dreicer, Esquire
Rosemary Cakmis, Assistant Federal Defender
U.S. Probation
U.S. Pretrial Services
U.S. Marshals Service
Defendant


Summaries of

United States v. Holmes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Sep 16, 2015
CASE NO: 3:14-cr-21-J-32PDB (M.D. Fla. Sep. 16, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL HOLMES

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 16, 2015

Citations

CASE NO: 3:14-cr-21-J-32PDB (M.D. Fla. Sep. 16, 2015)