From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Holley

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 17, 2022
3:20-CR-97-KAC-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 17, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-CR-97-KAC-JEM

03-17-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM HOLLEY, JR., Defendant.


ORDER

JILL E. McCOOK JUDGE

This case is before the Court on Defendant Holley's pro se Motion for New Counsel [Doc. 108], filed on March 14, 2022. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). At Defendant's initial appearance on October 21, 2020, the Court appointed CJA Panel Attorney R. Deno Cole to represent Defendant Holley [Doc. 10]. In his pro se filing, Defendant expresses concern about the lack of communication with counsel. Defendant states he and members of his family have attempted to contact Attorney Cole on multiple occasions but have received no response. Before substituting court-appointed counsel, the Court must find an actual conflict of interest or an irreparable breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. In the instant case, it appears Defendant's concerns could likely be remedied with additional communication. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS defense counsel to confer with Defendant Holley about the concerns expressed in his pro se filing [Doc. 108] and to file either a motion for review of the attorney-client relationship or a motion to withdraw the pro se motion, as appropriate. Defense counsel shall file a motion on or before March 24, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Holley

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 17, 2022
3:20-CR-97-KAC-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 17, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Holley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM HOLLEY, JR., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

3:20-CR-97-KAC-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 17, 2022)