From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Holland

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 4, 1978
565 F.2d 383 (5th Cir. 1978)

Opinion

No. 76-3763.

January 4, 1978.

Sterling G. Culpepper, Jr. (Court-Appointed), Charles S. Coody, Montgomery, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

Barry E. Teague, U.S. Atty., Milton L. Moss, Asst. U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr., Chief Judge.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.


The mandate of the court having prematurely issued incident to the panel opinion and having properly been complied with by the district court, and the cause having thereafter been voted en banc by the court,

IT IS ORDERED that the mandate herein remain undisturbed, that the opinion of the panel, reported at 552 F.2d 667, be withdrawn, and that the en banc court be dissolved.


Summaries of

United States v. Holland

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 4, 1978
565 F.2d 383 (5th Cir. 1978)
Case details for

United States v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WILLIAM W. HOLLAND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 4, 1978

Citations

565 F.2d 383 (5th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

United States v. Erwin

II. Magistrate's Jurisdiction to Issue the Order The appellant next argues that the magistrate had no legal…

State v. Mitchell

United States v. Holland, 552 F.2d 667 (5th Cir. 1977), is another grand jury handwriting exemplar case, but…