From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Holder

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Jun 20, 2024
2:23-CR-130 GSL (N.D. Ind. Jun. 20, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-CR-130 GSL

06-20-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL HOLDER


ORDER

Gretchen S. Lund United States District Court Judge

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on June 5, 2024 [DE 20]. Accordingly, the Court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Michael Holder's plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 and 2 of the Indictment, for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presentence Report must specifically identify the basis of the objection and any supporting authority. Should the Addendum to the Final Presentence Report reflect any outstanding objections by a party, that party must specifically state in its sentencing memorandum whether it maintains that objection. If so, the party must identify the basis and authority for its objection and, where applicable, any evidence the party expects to offer in support of that objection. The party should also state if, consistent with Rule 32(i)(3)(B), it does not believe a ruling on that objection will be necessary.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Holder

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Jun 20, 2024
2:23-CR-130 GSL (N.D. Ind. Jun. 20, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL HOLDER

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana

Date published: Jun 20, 2024

Citations

2:23-CR-130 GSL (N.D. Ind. Jun. 20, 2024)