Opinion
No. 2:11-CR-219 GGH
01-20-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NAKRY HOK, Defendant.
DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for NAKRY HOK BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney T. Zindel for J. Lee JUSTIN LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424
Federal Defender
TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
NAKRY HOK
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE
AND EXCLUDING TIME
Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, NAKRY HOK, through their respective attorneys, that the status conference presently scheduled for January 23, 2012, may be continued to February 27, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.
Counsel for the parties are considering two alternative resolutions. Additional time is needed to obtain and review information before the parties choose how to resolve the case. Also, defense counsel seeks additional time because of the need to schedule the lone Cambodian interpreter in the district in order to confer with his client. For these reasons, the parties agree that the ends of justice to be served by the granting of a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. They ask that time under the Speedy Trial Act be excluded through February 27, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL J. BRODERICK
Federal Defender
T. Zindel
TIMOTHY ZINDEL
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for NAKRY HOK
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
T. Zindel for J. Lee
JUSTIN LEE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
The status conference is continued to February 27, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time through February 27, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE