From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hoey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION
Aug 2, 2012
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 4:96cr53-13 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 4:96cr53-13

08-02-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. TONY HOEY.


[Previously Shelby Division]


ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [Doc. 668] and his Motion to Reconsider Petitioner's Request for a Sentence Reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) [Doc. 680].

In his first motion the Defendant apparently seeks the appointment of counsel. This motion is moot because on February 15, 2012 Attorney Ross Richardson appeared as counsel for the Defendant. [Doc. 672].

As to the second motion, neither the federal statutes nor the Rules of Criminal and Appellate Procedure provide for a motion for reconsideration in a criminal case. United States v. Joseph, 455 F. App'x. 341 (4th Cir. 2011).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [Doc. 668] is hereby DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Reconsider Petitioner's Request for a Sentence Reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) [Doc. 680] is hereby DENIED.

_____________

Martin Reidinger

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hoey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION
Aug 2, 2012
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 4:96cr53-13 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hoey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. TONY HOEY.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 2, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 4:96cr53-13 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2012)