From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Mar 19, 2013
1:12-cr-00204-JAW (D. Me. Mar. 19, 2013)

Summary

noting the lack of applicable First Circuit law, citing United States v. Charles, 738 F.2d 686, 692 (5th Cir. 1984), as persuasive authority for the defendant bearing the burden of persuasion

Summary of this case from United States v. Hicks

Opinion

1:12-cr-00204-JAW

03-19-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN THOMAS HINES


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed March 1, 2013, the Recommended Decision is accepted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Suppress (ECF No. 19) be and hereby is DENIED.

____________________________

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Mar 19, 2013
1:12-cr-00204-JAW (D. Me. Mar. 19, 2013)

noting the lack of applicable First Circuit law, citing United States v. Charles, 738 F.2d 686, 692 (5th Cir. 1984), as persuasive authority for the defendant bearing the burden of persuasion

Summary of this case from United States v. Hicks
Case details for

United States v. Hines

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN THOMAS HINES

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

1:12-cr-00204-JAW (D. Me. Mar. 19, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hicks

However, the majority of courts to consider the issue have “assigned the burden of proof to the defendant…