From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hilliard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 11, 2020
CRIMINAL ACTION 15-83-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Dec. 11, 2020)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION 15-83-SDD-EWD

12-11-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DERRICK HILLIARD


RULING

This matter is before the Court on the pro se Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence Pursuant to First Step Act Law 2018 Habeas Corpus Relief Under Section 102(b)(2) filed by Defendant, Derrick Hilliard ("Defendant"). The Government has filed an Opposition to the motion. In this motion, Defendant asks the Court to "act and move to apply unto the Movant's sentence credited good time of 54 days (good time 7 days)..." in accordance with the "First Step Act Law 2018."

Rec. Doc. No. 1754.

Rec. Doc. No. 1799.

Rec. Doc. No. 1754, p. 1.

However, the authority to calculate good time credits rests solely with the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP"). "After a district court sentences a federal offender, the Attorney General, through the BOP, has the responsibility for administering the sentence." "Although the statute does not explicitly say who is responsible for calculating the [§ 3585(b)] credit, controlling precedent indicates that it is the Attorney General acting through the Bureau of Prisons." Therefore, the Court lacks the authority to grant the relief requested by Defendant.

United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 335 (1991).

See United States v. Wynder, No. 15-31073, — Fed.Appx. —, 2016 WL 4547228, at *1 (5th Cir. Aug. 31, 2016)(citing Wilson, 503 U.S. at 334-35); see also United States v. Binion, 981 F.2d 1256 (5th Cir. 1992)(per curiam)("district courts have no jurisdiction to grant or deny credits at sentencing. The computation of credits is wholly the function of the United States Attorney General after the defendants begin their sentences.").

Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence Pursuant to First Step Act Law 2018 Habeas Corpus Relief Under Section 102(b)(2) is DENIED.

Rec. Doc. No. 1754. --------

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 11th day of December, 2020.

/s/ _________

SHELLY D. DICK

CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

United States v. Hilliard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 11, 2020
CRIMINAL ACTION 15-83-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Dec. 11, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Hilliard

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DERRICK HILLIARD

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Dec 11, 2020

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION 15-83-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Dec. 11, 2020)