From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA
Nov 2, 2016
Case No. 1:16-cr-97 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 2, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-cr-97

11-02-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORNELIUS Q. HILL


Judge McDonough/Steger REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge conducted a plea hearing in this case on October 25, 2016. At the hearing, Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Counts One, Two and Three of the Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the Government in the written Plea Agreement [Doc. 14] and Plea Agreement Supplement [Doc. 15] (hereinafter "Plea Agreement"). On the basis of the record made at the hearing, the Court finds that Defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by Defendant; it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the Plea Agreement; Defendant understands the nature of the charges and penalties provided by law; and the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

I therefore recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty to Counts One, Two and Three of the Indictment be accepted; the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in Counts One, Two and Three of the Indictment; and the written Plea Agreement be accepted at the time of sentencing. I further recommend that Defendant remain in custody until sentencing in this matter. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the Plea Agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the District Court Judge.

The Defendant's sentencing hearing is scheduled on January 27, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.

ENTER.

s/ Christopher H . Steger

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

You have the right to de novo review by the district judge of the foregoing findings. Any application for review must be in writing; must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to; and must be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the plea hearing. Failure to file objections within fourteen days constitutes a waiver of any further right to challenge the plea of guilty in this matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).


Summaries of

United States v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA
Nov 2, 2016
Case No. 1:16-cr-97 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 2, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORNELIUS Q. HILL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Nov 2, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:16-cr-97 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 2, 2016)